If, by his "Viva Madonna!" sign off he means to convey the idea "long live Madonna," he is in dire need of this page: Madonna's Longevity: She'll Always Be on Top! Or Will She?

I do not know whether his account of the Ananova story is true or not. I never did see an official retraction statement by Ananova (other than a link entitled "Story Withdrawn" on the page where the article formerly resided), nor did Ananova explain why the article was removed.

Why else would Madonna be thanking France for support of her 'American Life' single if it were not for the fact that France, like Madonna, was against American involvement in Iraq? I suppose it is too much to ask a Madonna fan to Get A Clue.

Even supposing for one moment that Madonna did not thank France for opposing the war in Iraq, or was not against American intervention in Iraq, there are still many other reasons to hate her guts.

A trend I have spotted in some of the hate mails I have received is that some of these Madonna fans are overlooking that I have not made any grand claims for my anti- Madonna site.

It is, simply, a site where I have fun taking pot shots at Madonna, pointing out where she is a hypocrite and a slut in order to bring home the point that she should not be admired.

Liberal entertainers such as Madonna should not be given a larger platform from which to cram their political, religious, and moral philosophies down the public's throats.

This is a site where I am able to express my own views on various subjects that Madonna comments on in interviews, or by way of her pop songs.

Madonna herself once sang a song of female empowerment called "Express Yourself." One would think that Madonna fans would support a female such as myself who is "Expressing herself" on this site. Madonna maniacs cannot seem to spot hypocrisy, though.

The web is a great leveling field. Madonna may be able to get her views heard widely on television and in major magazines, but on the web, I too can be heard by many people.

My site is a large 'op ed' (opinion / editorial) piece. What I usually do is mention a news item by some news organization that featured Madonna and use that as a jumping- off point.

I do not claim anywhere that I am a professional journalist tracking down original news tid bits about Madonna.

What I am doing with this site is more along the lines of 'social commentary.'

Taking all this into consideration, then, "jmc muzac's" sarcastic comments about me supposedly needing 'attention' (in that I must have a large ego) or me not being a 'reputable' source, etc., are groundless.

If anyone needs attention, it is Madonna, who is one of the world's biggest narcissists.

I did respond to this "jmc muzac" individual, but as I have stated in an auto- response e-mail I sometimes send out from my antimadonna e-mail address, I do not like to respond to these idiots who worship an untalented, unoriginal, anti- American whore.

Here is the copy of the e-mail I sent to this individual:

From: [Flea Dip Site Owner]

Subject: Re: site suggestion :)
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 09:35:54 +0800

You obviously didn't find it [the site and my points] 'idiotic' since you have bothered to sit down and compose this e-mail to me.

>>no objective information<<

Just as your e-mail, consisting of put- down after put- down was 'objective,' right?

>>Those sources, being a tad bit more important and reputable than yourself, <<

And what, exactly, makes me 'unreputable?' What I do is comment on information that is a *matter of public record.*

Furthermore, in most cases, I have provided the sources I am quoting from.

Whether Madonna actually *went to* France or not [or specifically mentioned Iraq in her comments to the French] is beside the point.

The point is that she is an un-American twit.

I do, however thank you for your clarification regarding that news story and will try to comment on it in the future.

>>Appeal to Authority<<

Where have I done this at the site? If you have bothered to read the articles at my site, you will see that no where do I say, "And so- and so- is the end-all, be-all authority on the topic of Madonna."

I point out on one page [of my site] that my qualification[s] for commenting on the Material Whore is that I've had to put up hearing about her in the media for years and years.

>>Ad Hominem <<

Well, duh. It's an 'anti madonna' site, remember?

>>and most importantly, Personal Attack<<

Hey, genius-- ad hominem, which you place before 'personal attack' on your list means that same thing as 'personal attack.'

What did you do, go to a page that lists logical fallacies and paste them in your e mail to me? Don't use the terms if you don't know what they mean.

Madonna fans really are not the brightest [sharpest] tools in the shed...

As we can easily see, this is another case of a Madonna fan popping off before getting all her facts. I already have responses to the "get a life" sort of complaints on the FAQs page.

As I write this, I am 32 years old, and other than one single by "Pink," I do not listen to J Lo, Britney, Kylie and so on.

I grew up being subjected to Madonna since the release of her first debut album back in 1983. I take it, then, that this "Charlotte Vanraes" is what, about 15 years old, maybe early 20s?

I also most note with irony how this person goes on to say that such- and- such a celebrity has been 'inspired' by Madonna, but that she obviously did not even reflect upon the series of pages I have under the "Unoriginal Girl" section of the site, which show how Madonna has ripped off everyone from Debbie Harry (who has probably inspired many more singers than Madonna ever has or will) to Marlon Brando.

As I mention on the "Introduction" page, there are, as of May and June 2003, many, many anti- Britney Spears sites on the web but only one about Madonna (not counting mine).

Other than the occasional bad Madonna movie review, one does not come across too many anti- Madonna pages on the web or even in magazines or the newspaper. Probably because Madonna has fallen out of popularity; she is irrelevant.

I do not make anything up about Madonna at the site, and no, most of my information about Madonna is not "90% gossip." Most of the stories on the site are a matter of public record.

Madonna has quite openly been a slutty little tart in the public eye going back to the early 1980s -- she used to believe it was her duty or right to offend people by playing with her crotch in her music videos and concerts and pulling other, similar raunchy stunts. She's had at least one bastard -- she was not married when she had her first kid. More examples could be cited, but you get the idea.

The bottom line is that I have provided the sources for the quotes I make to demonstrate that I am not lying about any of the information at the site.

The truth suffices; Madonna makes herself look bad.

I have no need or desire to lie about anything Madonna has said or done -- as a matter of fact, that is one of the reasons I hate her guts. Madonna is a total whore, and one who has used people throughout her career, and yet some feminists hold her up as a role model, which is something I find utterly disgusting.

From: [Anti Madonna Site Owner]

To: BEACHWOOD2222@aol.com

Subject: Re: Your Site
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 07:45:55 +0800

What I look like is irrelevant. My physical appearance has nothing to do with the fact that Madonna has based her career on copying off Marilyn Monroe and other celebrities.

What I look like does not change the fact that Madonna is a slut who slept with men and women to get recording contracts and magazine coverage.

Deal with it.

If you are absolutely dying to know: I look like a human being. I have two eyes, a nose, and a mouth.